mignon@welltopia.com

Cholesterol drugs may prevent cancer, and a whole lot more

By Mignon Fogarty
This article originally appeared in The Scientist, Novebmer 17, 2003


The 25 million people who take cholesterol-lowering drugs like Lipitor may be in for a nice surprise. New research reported at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting in New Orleans, LA shows that people who take these "statin" drugs are less likely to get colon cancer, supporting the idea that statins are providing more bang for their buck than previously thought. In a questionnaire-based study including thousands of people researchers found that those who took statins had a  51% lower risk of developing colorectal cancer than people who didn’t take statins.
 
Furthermore, a growing mountain of research suggests that statins could also prevent or treat diseases ranging from Alzheimer's to osteoporosis to multiple sclerosis. With promising results in a wide variety of studies, statins are poised to become the next aspirin. Just as aspirin has expanded its repertoire beyond headaches, statins may expand their already nearly $20 billion (U.S.) market.
 
Nevertheless, dangerous side effects temper this enthusiasm; a few patients have experienced rare muscle degeneration. And while some quip that drinking water should be statinated, researchers remain dubious. "No one should ever consider putting [a statin] in the water. It's still a drug. It still causes adverse effects, and its use must be monitored by a physician," says Larry Sparks, senior scientist at Arizona's Sun Health Research Institute.
 
Statins are designed to target just one enzyme, HMG coA reductase, that makes cholesterol. But that same enzyme also influences  vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin D, coenzyme Q, and steroid hormones like estrogen. Researchers are starting to think statins could have far-reach effects. "All of the intermediate compounds between HMG coA reductase and cholesterol are being reduced, and this offers a gold mine for looking at other things," says David Kritchevsky, of the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia.
 
Just as a greater understanding of aspirin's mechanisms of action has inspired the development of more specific COX inhibitors like Celebrex(TM) and Vioxx (TM), Kritchevsky says that a better understanding of statins' roles in divergent and downstream pathways will aid in developing more specific drugs that directly harness statins' off-target effects. "We never paid attention to these compounds ... but they just offer fantastic potential for discovering new compounds that act on many diseases other than atherosclerosis," he says.

CAN STATINS STOP CANCER?

The new research presented by Dr. Stephen Gruber of the University of Michigan at the ASCO meeting confirms what scientists have been studying for a while now. "Statins may have unexpected activity in cancer, because the same pathways that are at work in the immune system are also in play in neoplastic cells," says Lawrence Steinman, professor of neurology and neurological science at Stanford University.
 
Jane Cauley, professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh has also conducted a large study looking at statins and cancer where she reviewing the long-term cancer follow-up results from the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study (4S). People in the study had a lower risk of dying of cancer.
 
Cauley cautions that the results were not statistically significant, but says they were, "hypothesis generating," particularly when viewed in light of animal data showing that statins inhibit tumor growth. And indeed, her study found a reduction in breast cancer in women who take both statins and other cholesterol-lowering drugs.
 
A PILE OF EVIDENCE ON DEMENTIA

"Statins definitely reduce your incidence of stroke ... so from that standpoint, statins will reduce the risk of dementia," says Len Kritharides, an associate professor at the University of Sydney in Australia. Researchers also are hopeful that statins can combat dementia caused by Alzheimer disease . After all, high cholesterol is a risk factor for Alzheimer's.
 
Sparks first glimpsed the relationship between cholesterol and Alzheimer's as a forensic scientist sorting through old brain slides. "All the demented people were in the heart disease pile," he says. With this clue in hand, he looked for the tell-tale signs of Alzheimer's in the brains of rabbits that has gorged on cholesterol -- a great model for heart disease that had been ignored by Alzheimer's researchers. "They had all kinds of b-amyloid in their brains," he says. When he stopped feeding them cholesterol the b-amyloid, a sign of Alzheimer's, went away; and when they received cholesterol-lowering drugs it didn't build up in the first place.
 
Sparks says that cholesterol doesn't necessarily cause Alzheimer's, but instead fuels the fire once the other important players such as b-amyloid are in place. "Cholesterol promotes the production of this toxin, b-amyloid," he says, but then other environmental and genetic factors cause it to build up to disease-causing levels. For example, although the roles of inflammation and immune response in Alzheimer's are far from dogma, a variety of studies have suggested that statins could modulate both. They might work, for example, by reducing C-reactive protein levels in the plasma. Thus, it is tempting to theorize that statins could influence the development of Alzheimer's through anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory action.
 
DOWNSTREAM EVENTS: MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

There is little doubt that the immune system is central to the disease process in multiple sclerosis (MS), and in a recent mouse study Lipitor restored movement to paralyzed animals and prevented further paralysis. "These effects [of statins] on the immune system are entirely independent of their effects on cholesterol," says Lawrence Steinman, professor of neurology and neurological science at Stanford University.
 
Statins influence the immune system and may influence MS outcomes by blocking the production an important immune system component, and preventing inflammation. Steinman says they're working on the mechanism and believe it involves compounds somewhere the statin acts before it gets to cholesterol. "Some of these [intermediate metabolites] are unexpected and of immense importance in modulating the immune system," he says.
 
UNKNOWNS ABOUND

Cauley, too, acknowledges she doesn't know how statins cause their effects, but because the incidence of cancer in her studies was reduced whether patients used statins or other cholesterol-lowering drugs, she suspects the effect is directly related to cholesterol levels. Cauley also notes other possible statin mechanisms that could be influencing cancer: In addition to immunomodulation and anti-inflammatory effects, researchers have presented studies showing that statins may activate enzymes that degrade cell-cycle proteins -- proteins important for cell division, which could clearly have an effect on cancer cells. Even lowering of lipids alone could lead to an indirect effect such as a change in sex steroid levels that perturb cancer. Despite the uncertainty, Cauley says the collection of data is promising. "[It] suggests that this whole idea is not just a statistical fluke, but there is some biological plausibility," she says.

A BONE TO PICK

Osteoporosis appears the least likely candidate to have a statin connection. "Bone density doesn't seem to have any connection to cholesterol," says Kritchevsky. Nevertheless, in 1999 Gregory Mundy showed that statins increased the expression of an important bone-generating molecule and enhanced new bone formation in mice. Furthermore, bisphosphonate drugs like Evista (TM) and Fosamax(TM) inhibit bone resorbtion and are also act in the middle of the cholesterol pathway. As with Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, and cancer, no randomized, controlled human clinical trial has been done yet to prove a benefit. After-the-fact analysis of patients from the cholesterol-lowering trials showed that patients got fractures at the same rate whether they were taking statins or not.
 
These trials have limitations because enrollees may not have been at high risk of osteoporosis in the first place. For example, such trials tended to have fewer women than men enrolled as well as people who would have been too young to show clinical signs of osteoporosis. Despite the limitations, Kritharides is reluctant to dismiss the studies' negative findings. "They are incredibly powerful because they are randomized and controlled," he says. Even so, Kritharides says the results from other observational studies warrant further research into the effect of statins on osteoporosis.
 
The good news about statins is that despite concerns about rare side effects, these drugs, which so many people already rely on to reduce their risk of atherosclerosis, could also be reducing their risk of diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer's. If statins are indeed found to prevent or treat other conditions, Food and Drug Administration approval is likely to be accelerated because of the existing data from the millions of people already using them, says Steinman. "Instead of taking 10 years, you could just work with the established compound."